Poster

posters portrait and landscape

This poster is about knowing your limits on surfing the internet. You will never know that the authorities are tracking you down day by day.

tutorial case

This is a case study based on the tutorial section that is given.

1) Linda was stunned in front her PC when she received an electronic mail, in a chain of senders and receivers, telling bad things about herself, her crazy shopping habits, her domestic problems and her involvement in superstitious activities with a bomoh(magician) allegedly for gaining her more wealth and fortunes. She is now thinking to pursue legal actions for the unfavorable email against her. With reference to the above case, explain the meaning of online defamation, and discuss the legal remedies available for Linda. (Nov 2004)

Defamation means something attack the good reputation of somebody or say bad things about somebody , meaning as a result of malice, desire to harm someone else and its a unprivileged statement of fact. Online defamation means someone attack somebody else through Internet. One would have grounds for a lawsuit if remarks were made about them that were defaming to their character online. The side have to prove that the statement is false as well as malice in order to win for the lawsuit.

In Linda case, Linda can prove the email for her lawyer to against the senders. In Malaysia, in LAW OF MALAYSIA, penal code section 499 to section 502 is applicable for the case as Linda. If the senders is found guilty, he or she might get punishment. This can be divided into civil or criminal cases. In civil cases, the person sue the makers just want to get compensation on what he/she had damage on the person’s reputation. But, in criminal cases, whoever defames another shall be punished with two years of jail or with fine or with both. For Linda, she can sue the person for damage her reputation , get compensation and seek for apologizes.

2. Tommy, a Multimedia student at MMU, was caught by University authority after it was found that he had cracked the University’s information system, defaced the front page of University’s official website and stolen a bulk of confidential data regarding students’ academic records. It was also discovered that he had attempted to break several lecturers’ computer system but without avail. On the investigation he said that all his action was just for fun exploring the system’s weaknesses and without any criminal intention. In this case, advise the University regarding Tommy’s liabilities arising from his actions with reference to the law of computer crimes in Malaysia.

What is cyber crime? Cyber crime can be simple be describe as access other people ’s personal computer without any authorised right. Other than that, illegal interception or someone damage or delete computer data without right, can be said as cyber crime too. In Malaysia Law, cyber crime can fall into Computer Crime Act 1997 that related to the misuse of computer.

Tommy had cracked university’s information system and this is the acts of unauthorized access on CCA 1997 , section 3. An person shall be guilty of an offence if (a) he causes a pc to perform any function with intent to secure access to any program or data held in any computer ; (b)the access is unauthorized ; (c) the person knows at the time when he causes the computer to perform the function. Whoever fall under this section , will be liable to a maximum RM50,000 fine or 5 years jail or both.

Furthermore, Tommy had done another serious act which is defaced the front page of University’s official website and stolen a bulk of confidential data regarding students’ academic records. This can lead him under Computer Crime Act 1997 ,Section 5(1) which is the person modified of the contents of a computer without any rights. IF the person is found any guilty under this act, will be punishable with a maximum RM 100,000.00 fine or to 7 years imprisonment or to both. Nevertheless, Tommy said his action is just for fun exploring the system’s weaknesses and without any criminal intention. But, what he did was attempted to unauthorized access to his university ’s system.

Why is Korea a heaven for cybercriminals?

Korea shows in the top of many statistics tracking spam, phish, zombies, or other various kinds of cybercrimes. Why is this?

There are few apparent reasons - the dominance of the Windows OS in Korea, anecdotal lack of interest in cybersecurity, and state-of-the-art Internet infrastructure make Korea a top choice for cybercriminals. The numbers showing Korea as one of the top producers of Internet threats is not due to Koreans’ bad manners or nature. In fact, most of the attacks originating from Korea are not even caused by Koreans - instead, criminals from all over the world target Korean computers and try to create zombie networks with Korean computers just because they are guaranteed high throughput and efficiency of their attacks.

Because roughly 14 million of the nation’s 15.5 households are connected to always-on high-speed Internet, Korea makes a prime target for virus and worm viruses. The Korean government even plans to increase the speed of the Internet to 100 megabits per second by 2010, about 50 times faster than the current speed.

Korea has done a great job in creating an exemplary Internet infrastructure and has achieved the highest broadband penetration in the world. But with success comes responsibility, and the Korean government should take steps to educate and protect technologically the network they have created.

Cybercrime is based on any form of illegal act for which knowledge of computer technology is essential for either its perpetration, investigation, or prosecution. With korea's great penetration on the highest broadband in the world, they should also keep up with the e-security in order to protect the rights of the public users.

Fight against child porn stepped up

BBC reports on increased efforts of the Attorney General Gonzales to push for measures that would allow law enforcement to combat what the AG has called epidemic" of child pornography.

Gonzales has proposed changes in the law under the Child Pornography and Obscenity Prevention Amendments of 2006 (COPA’s earlier version was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court) where ISPs would be required to report child pornography and bolster penalties for those parties who fail to do so. In addition, Gonzales also wants to find ways to require ISPs to retain records (logs) of user’s activities for longer period of time so that law enforcement can have a longer trail when tracking an alleged offender.

The European Union’s Directive on Data Retention mandates ISPs in Europe to preserve call and Internet records for a period of 6 to 24 months (as specified by each EU country’s government). It seems that AG Gonzales seeks to impose similar obligations to US ISPs which, under current law, are not required to maintain any records of ordinary activity (unless of course they are served with a timely subpoena.) Attorney General’s statement on these new proposed requirements included,

The investigation and prosecution of child predators depends critically on the availability of evidence that is often in the hands of internet service providers.
…
Unfortunately, the failure of some internet service providers to keep records has hampered our ability to conduct investigations in this area.

The debate in the US as to ISP data retention requirements has already started, and Gonzales’ statements will definitely help fuel the conversation. At stake are vital interests to subscriber privacy and law enforcement’s ability to prevent and catch among some of the most heinous crimes.

This is partly an act in sexual harassment which leads to cyber stalking is definitely unethical as it is a form of invading a person’s privacy. A cyber stalker relies upon the mystery afforded by the Internet to allow them to stalk their victim without being detected. Cyber stalking messages different from common spam which is cyber stalker targets a specific victim with often threatening messages, while the spammer targets a large number of recipients with simply annoying messages.

Spike in cyberstalking cases

KUALA LUMPUR: Cyberstalking or online harassment cases are on the rise in Malaysia, according to CyberSecurity Malaysia.

“The number of cyberstalking cases reported until October this year was 151 incidents compared to 72 for the whole of last year,” said CyberSecurity Malaysia chief executive officer Lt Col (retired) Husin Jazri.

“This figure could also be higher because not all harassment cases are reported by the victims,” he added.

Cyberstalking is when an individual or a group of individuals use the Internet or other electronic channels to stalk someone with malicious intentions.

The behaviour of a stalker includes making false accusations, slander, threats and sexual exploitation.

Compromising and abusing a victim’s e-mail accounts, identity theft, and gathering information about victims for the purpose of harassing are also typical behaviours of a stalker, Husin said.

In most cases the stalkers are people known to the victims and these may include the victim’s former partners, ex-spouse, colleagues, friends and competitors.

In Malaysia, the issue of cyber stalking is governed by Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. Any contravention with this provision is a criminal offence where on conviction, the accused may be liable to a fine not exceeding fifty thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year or to both and shall also be liable to a further fine of one thousand ringgit for everyday or part of a day during which the offence is continued after conviction.

for more information : http://star-techcentral.com/tech/story.asp?file=/2009/11/16/technology/20091116111900&sec=technology

Mininova Forced to Remove Pirated Torrents

Although Mininova is the most popular BitTorrent service on the web, this doesn't stop the copyright organization to go after the website and force it to remove copyright

infringement torrent files. For those of you who don't know, Mininova is way more popular than The Pirate Bay, being placed on position number 52 in the Alexa traffic ranking. According to TorrentFreak, BREIN, a Dutch anti-piracy group, said it would file a lawsuit against the BitTorrent service in order to force it to remove torrent files linking to pirated content.

However, the Mininova administrators are prepared to go to the judge, pointing to the internal guidelines which promptly explain that downloading from the website is not illegal as the content published on it is not protected by copyright. Moreover, in case some anti-piracy groups suspect Mininova of copyright infringement, the service has always been opened to talks and infringing content could be removed without the need for a lawsuit.

for more information : http://news.softpedia.com/news/Mininova-Forced-to-Remove-Pirated-Torrents-85991.shtml

This is an ethical act of law to remove the pirated torrents in order to save the copy right work. Copyright gives its owner exclusive rights to control, use and exploit the copyrighted work or parts of it for personal gain, profit or otherwise. Copyright protects the specific expression rather than the underlying idea under Malaysia’s Copyright Act 1987

tutorial section

We are asked to find an article as a group and discuss it in the class. Therefore, me and my groupmates agreed on selecting this article on Standardize Bumi status.

KUCHING: The definition of bumiputra status in Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak should be standardised, said Sarawak Teachers’ Union (STU) president William Ghani Bina.

He said under the Federal Constitution, a child born in the peninsula would be accorded the status as long as one of the parents was a bumiputra.

In Sabah, a child is considered a bumiputra if his or her father is one.

However, for Sarawak, the Federal Constitution states that for a child to be a bumiputra, both parents must be bumiputra.

“How can we have three different definition of bumiputra status if we want to promote the 1Malaysia concept?

“We want this to be rectified, and to get Sabah and Sarawak to follow the same definition as being used in the peninsula,” Ghani said yesterday.

Urging the Federal Government to standardise the definition, he said the basis should be race and not religion.

Ghani was asked to comment on the plight of several Sarawakian students who had been denied places in university matriculation programmes because they were of mixed parentage and, therefore, did not enjoy bumiputra status.

Although this is a sensitive issue, but on my opinion, the government should standardize the bumiputra status because sabah and sarawak are also parts of Malaysia and they have the rights to be one of the bumiputra status as easily as the peninsular Malaysia obtain their's status.